What’s Next after Sequential Intercepts Model Mapping: Technology Solutions for Interagency Partners

Agency (1).png The concept was developed by researchers at Policy Research Associates (PRA), including Mark Munetz and Patricia Griffin (2006).

Today, Policy Research Associates Systems Mapping and Training Center (SMTC) provides several distinct mapping approaches designed to help communities understand how people move through complex service systems, including Homeless Response Systems and Crisis Intercepts Mapping. In 2025, PRA reported facilitating over 400 mapping workshops across the United States. Moreover, additional mapping efforts occur through state‑supported initiatives and partnerships with agencies such as the SAMHSA GAINS Center.

Communities that participate in a SIM mapping typically leave with a set of concrete products and shared outputs. These outputs help communities translate the mapping exercise into actionable planning and ongoing systems improvement, which can translate into new local community response services. Mapping has been groundbreaking in helping stakeholders identify system gaps and opportunities for collaboration. 

SIM Outcomes

One of the most important outcomes of a Sequential Intercept Model (SIM) mapping process is the development of a shared systems language among stakeholders. The intercept framework provides a common way for participants to describe how individuals with behavioral health needs interact with crisis response, law enforcement, courts, corrections, treatment providers, and community services. The SIM framework helps bridge these differences by establishing a consistent structure for discussing system pathways, intervention points, and opportunities for diversion or support. As a result, communities frequently identify the need to track indicators such as service referrals, diversion outcomes, program utilization, and transitions between justice and behavioral health systems. These priorities help inform the development of performance and reporting structures.

Practitioners can leave the process with a clearer understanding of system challenges and potential reforms needed, but fewer tools for operationalizing those insights. Moreover, emerging programs may lack the data infrastructure needed to track their progress, monitor implementation, and inform ongoing decision-making. Without a dedicated data infrastructure, practitioners often find themselves asking a familiar question after the mapping process concludes: "What’s next?”

Why Interagency Data Systems Are Essential at Each Intercept

When designed with strong ethical governance and privacy protections, these systems allow communities to better understand who is entering the system, where interventions occur, how services are used, and whether reforms are improving outcomes. In this way, interagency data infrastructure becomes a critical component for translating SIM mapping insights into sustained systems improvement, accountability, and evidence-based decision-making.

  • To coordinate service to the appropriate and least restrictive community-based support

  • To track how many people are coming into the system, where they enter, how long they stay, how frequently they use services, and what services they receive (or don’t).

  • To support reporting requirements for funders, for accountability, and to justify resources.

  • To enable cross-system integration: e.g. behavioral health, courts, probation, jail, and reentry agencies sharing data securely.

Core Interagency Data System Features Needed

 

Key Data Systems Features

Why It Matters

  • Ethical Data Governance

Guides the responsible collection, sharing, and use of sensitive PII/PHI data. 

  • Compliance (HIPAA, 42 CFR, Part 2, Human Subjects data protection & confidentiality)

Especially important when health + justice data intersect. Protects consent, privacy, and expectations for confidentiality across systems. 

  • Interoperability & data exchange (secure sharing across justice, health, behavioral health, courts)

Prevents duplication; enables tracking individuals across intercepts.

  • Real-time or near real-time update & feedback

Effective decision-making (diversion, crisis response, coordination, and planning

  • Standardized metrics & outcome tracking

For performance, grant reporting, and comparing across communities.

  • User-friendly dashboards & visualization tools

Educates citizens & community stakeholders. Build a case for program sustainability. 

  • Privacy, security, compliance (HIPAA, 42 CFR, Part 2, Human Subjects data protection & confidentiality)

Especially important when health + justice data intersect. Protects consent, privacy, and expectations for confidentiality across systems. 

 

A central component of this framework is ethical data governance, which emphasizes privacy, security, and regulatory compliance in the collection, storage, and sharing of sensitive information. While many data integration initiatives emphasize large-scale data merging or universal interoperability across agencies, these approaches raise significant concerns related to privacy, consent, and the potential misuse of sensitive information. An ethical data governance approach places privacy, confidentiality, and informed consent at the center of system design. Ethical data systems often emphasize the use of de-identified, aggregated, or privacy-preserving data structures that allow communities to analyze trends and evaluate programs without unnecessarily exposing personally identifiable information.

 

What You Can Do

Ready to turn your mapping insights into actionable solutions involving real-time decision-making and impact assessment? Connect with our team to explore how ethical, evidence-driven solutions from # ARETGroup can strengthen your community programs and support measurable outcomes across agencies.

 

Request_1.png 

 

Currently there are no comments, so be the first!